Whether you want to document an important event, share a quick tutorial about a new product, or even just field some questions from your audience, live video is a valuable tool for nearly every business. There are a lot of programs and apps out there, but many have fizzled out or left the market entirely, like the once buzz worthy Meerkat app. A few heavy hitters in the live video trend remain – Periscope and Facebook Live Streaming are the most notable. It can be a difficult decision to determine which app would be the most useful for your business, but we will try to help you make sense of it all by comparing these two live broadcasting apps.
Periscope is a highly popular app devoted strictly to live streaming video. Users note that it’s easy to use and has features not usually available on other apps. These unique qualities could be the reason for its popularity and over 200 million streams in its first year. After six weeks of being live, Twitter bought Periscope for $86 million dollars.
Users can find your video content by entering your username or finding your stream via a world map. You can stream a video either on your phone or through a GoPro HD camera. Also, you can sketch on the screen while broadcasting. This can help when describing a topic or pointing things out for the audience.
After a live stream, the video is automatically archived on your Periscope profile for 24 hours for replay.
Facebook’s live video feature is just one facet of this juggernaut. It’s pretty simple and similar to the usability of Periscope: you record yourself via a smart phone for your followers to tune in and watch. The video of your broadcast will be streamed natively onto Facebook, and whether the user is on a smart phone or computer they will be able to see it.
Most people are aware of how big Facebook has become. As of 2016, there are over 1.7 billion active users using the website, phone or tablet app.
So which one is better?
Facebook and Periscope are both very powerful, but we think one clearly dominates the other. Let’s go over a few features and discuss facets of live video and which app is superior.
Reach – Facebook
This one’s a no-brainer. Facebook is the winner by far! Although Periscope has some serious video stream numbers, their active viewer count is at about the 1 million mark. That’s a low number for a social media platform. The cause of this could be that when people use Periscope they are using it to tune into a specific user. If they only follow a handful of users, they may only use the app a few times a month at most.
The great thing about Facebook is that once you start live streaming, all the followers of your business page will get a notification that you have gone live. Unlike posting video, graphic or text content that garners maybe 7% reach per post, you will alert 100% of your followers of what you’re doing once you live broadcast. This gives you a greater chance to reach and engage followers who may not always see your content.
Customization – Periscope
Periscope allows you to sketch on the video as well as record on other high definition video devices. This is great for those who want to capture higher quality videos. Facebook live video is currently on smart phone only, but will soon be offered on your web browser as well. Still, that might not produce high definition quality videos, and depending upon your business this might be very important.
Archive Ability – Facebook
Periscope only allows you to archive your videos for up to 24 hours on your page. Many users download their video content afterwards and upload them to YouTube to either monetize them or simply just to have them on hand.
On the other hand, Facebook gives you the ability to not only download the video after completion but also allows you to save the video so it will always be on your Facebook page. If you want to keep it strictly as a once watched live-only event, you have that ability as well. These features make Facebook the winner.
Convenience – Facebook
Think of those 1.7 billion active users on Facebook. Now think of the likelihood that most of your fans are on Facebook. If you want to reach the largest chunk of your audience, wouldn’t you want to use Facebook? Using a different app to live stream video might potentially dilute the success of your broadcast.
If you are convinced you need to use Periscope, the one benefit is that you do not need an account to view the live stream. So you can link your Periscope on Facebook and your users can find it there.
Staying Power – Facebook
Let’s face it: Apps may come and go, but Facebook proves to be eternal. Many users have been on Facebook for 10 years and upwards, so to consider it going under anytime soon is highly unlikely. As previously stated, Periscope has a low active user count plus it is owned by a currently flailing Twitter. If it doesn’t become more successful soon, it may fail. When Twitter is sold (soon) Periscope might be dissolved and somehow integrated into Twitter, a la Facebook live video. There are many “IFs” in the future of Periscope that do not apply to Facebook.
We suggest using the Facebook live video feature. Although it may not have the customizable features Periscope may have, there are many more benefits that make up for what it is lacking.
If you are still curious about Periscope, don’t be afraid to try it out. Periscope may very well be worth it for you and your business. Although we have made an assessment about the app, social media takes a lot of testing and experimenting to find the right marketing mix for your business. So never be afraid to be curious, creative and bold. Good luck!
Tags: app analysis, apps, b2b, b2c, facebook, live stream, periscope, phone apps, phone only apps, small business, startup
This post was written by Sara Wenner